Last year's Socialist Party candidate for the French presidency, Ségolène Royal, is in Boston this week, making a series of appearances at Harvard and MIT, who are jointly sponsoring her visit. Star gazer that I am, I endeavored to catch up with Royal at an afternoon session held in Cambridge yesterday, but due to a late departure from work, the creative route that I improvised to MIT, and an event announcement which led to a non-existent address, I arrived about fifty minutes into the session, after Royal had made her remarks, and well into the Q&A. I believe she spotted me as I entered the room and that she was disconcerted by my resemblance to François Hollande, at least when I'm viewed from 200 feet away. (In the future, I will think of that largely imaginary encounter as "our moment.")
At first I was disappointed by the substance of the questions posed by the MIT crowd, as they all related to the university system. Students are so insulated, I thought. Then I realized that the subject of the talk had been Reforming French Higher Education, so my disappointment changed into an admiration that the questioners could stay on topic. Obviously, it would be ridiculous for me to offer any summary of the event, but I came away with the impression that French higher education, while of excellent quality, is very rigid when compared to America's. If you decide to become a doctor in your mid-twenties, tant pis, you should have thought of that when you were eighteen and had entered business school. In a similar vein, foreign enrollment in French universities is not impossible but might as well be, and elitism is still a factor for those Français et Françaises attempting to matriculate in the country's best schools. In other words, the French bureaucracy that we all know and love doesn't stop at university gates, and it is counterproductive.
As for Royal herself, she was articulate, warm, and wry. Able to understand most questions asked in English, she chose to respond in French, her words translated by a MIT French professor. (Note to translators: Try to avoid your own commentary when doing your job. You're not why we're there.) It's sexist to comment on a politician's appearance, since that's usually done only when said politician is a woman. Having offered that concession, I note that fluorescent bulbs made the MIT auditorium look grubby, but Royal, in contrast, was far from being a victim of the bad quality of the light.
As always when it comes to these matters, the best reportage on Royal's visit is available on Art Goldhammer's French Politics blog.
Recent Comments